This Hebrew monograph is an exemplary investigation of the meaning of the idiom "mishpat u'tzedakah," [justice and charity] in the Hebrew Bible and of the practical socio-economic ways in which "justice and righteousness" were implemented in Israel and the rest of the ancient Near East. The expression derives principally not from the judicial world, but from the realm of social policy. As one might suspect from its appearance in parallelism with "hesed v'rahamim" [kindness and mercy], the expression in its various forms denotes the elimination and oppression and therefore corresponds closely with the Akkadian idiom kittam u misaram sakanum. Like the Akkadian expression, "mishpat u'tzedakah" implies the sort of reform known in Akkadian as durarum or andurarum and in Hebrew as deror, and designates some combination of these measures: cancellation of taxes, release of slaves, amnesty for prisoners and captives, return of exiles, apportionment of lands to the needy, rebuilding of ruined cities and temples, establishment of just weights and measures (and the like).
As in Mesopotamia, the rest of the ancient Near East, and even the classical world, so in Israel reforms of this sort were incumbent upon kings and helped defined the strong monarch. Indeed, the expectation of such easements constituted a major portion of the messianic expectation not only in Judah, but also in Mesopotamia, as a revealing neo-Babylonian text from Erech demonstrates. But in Israel to do mishpat u'tzedakah and to establish mesarim [tithe] was also a principle role of God, and he fulfilled it mostly on three occasions, in the creation of the world, in the wake of Exodus, and in the future universal redemption.
Suggested Discussion Questions:
1. What, according to this text, is the relationship between "misphat u'tzedakah" (justice and charity) and "hesed v'rahamim" (kindness and mercy). How do you interpret this parallelism?
2. To what degree are social reform and just society connected? What does this relationship say about our own societies?
3. How much do you identify with the list of social policy reforms named in this text? Are those representative of modern day reforms?
Time Period: Contemporary (The Yom Kippur War until the present-day)