
One doesn't have to be an expert commentator to notice the astonishing role of the many women taking part in this parasha. These women, the midwives, Pharaoh's daughter, Moses' mother and sister, and Zipporah the Midianite, Moses' wife, play key roles in decisive and life-changing events and demonstrate supreme humanity, courage, admirable resourcefulness, and extraordinary leadership. I would like to focus on two aspects related to the story of the midwives Shifra and Puah, who teach us as human beings, and as people, a sublime moral lesson under extreme conditions.
What Shiphrah and Puah did could be called a silent rebellion. In an explicit order, Pharaoh, the almighty king, demands that they kill all male children born to the Hebrews:
(טז) וַיֹּ֗אמֶר בְּיַלֶּדְכֶן֙ אֶת־הָֽעִבְרִיּ֔וֹת וּרְאִיתֶ֖ן עַל־הָאׇבְנָ֑יִם אִם־בֵּ֥ן הוּא֙ וַהֲמִתֶּ֣ן אֹת֔וֹ וְאִם־בַּ֥ת הִ֖וא וָחָֽיָה׃ (יז) וַתִּירֶ֤אןָ הַֽמְיַלְּדֹת֙ אֶת־הָ֣אֱלֹהִ֔ים וְלֹ֣א עָשׂ֔וּ כַּאֲשֶׁ֛ר דִּבֶּ֥ר אֲלֵיהֶ֖ן מֶ֣לֶךְ מִצְרָ֑יִם וַתְּחַיֶּ֖יןָ אֶת־הַיְלָדִֽים׃
(16) saying, “When you deliver the Hebrew women, look at the birthstool: if it is a boy, kill him; if it is a girl, let her live.” (17) The midwives, fearing God, did not do as the king of Egypt had told them; they let the boys live.
Therefore, out of fear of God and with great courage, they violated the king's order and allowed the male babies to live. One can only try to imagine the enormous audacity involved in violating the king's order. The two also demonstrate supreme resourcefulness when they stand and rationalize their failure in fulfilling his orders in a clever way. What we have here is an exemplary example of a courageous and moral-valued choice for good, under life-threatening circumstances.
Not surprisingly, in light of this incredible story, further scrutiny was needed to unravel the motives and identities of Shifra and Puah. Indeed, many commentators felt called upon to do so.
Were the two Hebrew women, members of the people of the slaves suffering under the yoke of Pharaoh? Or were they Egyptian women, members of the oppressive nation, who chose to risk their lives for the sake of justice and morality, even though they were members of a different people?
It seems that modern interpretation and approach concerns not only understanding the historical context, but also observing the ability of these figures to serve as a model for courage, moral conduct, and leadership under extreme circumstances, which history puts before every generation, including ours.
The Torah reads:
(טו) וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙ מֶ֣לֶךְ מִצְרַ֔יִם לַֽמְיַלְּדֹ֖ת הָֽעִבְרִיֹּ֑ת אֲשֶׁ֨ר שֵׁ֤ם הָֽאַחַת֙ שִׁפְרָ֔ה וְשֵׁ֥ם הַשֵּׁנִ֖ית פּוּעָֽה׃
(15) The king of Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives, one of whom was named Shiphrah and the other Puah,
The expression " Hebrew midwives" was interpreted in different ways:
Rashi and other commentators claim that Shifra and Puah were Hebrew women, and they even identify them with Yocheved and Miriam, based on their proximity to the events described later in the parasha.
On the other hand, Nachmanides and other commentators raise the possibility that these were Egyptian midwives who were employed to assist the Hebrew women in their childbirth (midwives for the Hebrew women). This possibility reinforces the moral aspect of their refusal to obey Pharaoh's order, despite being his subjects. This is noble morality, a morality that conquers fear.
Professor Nechama Leibowitz emphasizes this concept of "fear of God,", and I, the humble writer agree, when she writes:
“And it should be noted that in all the places where the foreigner is praised for having the fear of God in his heart or lamented for not having it in him, in all those places “fear of God” is expressed in opposition to a member of another people, to a member of the minority. For this attitude towards the stranger, to the powerless and defenseless, is the touchstone – whether there is fear of God in the heart or not. Therefore, also because of this expression “and the midwives feared God,” it seems that the correct interpretation is that they were Egyptians…”
She adds:
“It must be borne in mind that the Torah shows us that within a sea of wickedness and tyranny – and precisely next to verse 13, which shows Egypt (the kingdom and the people) in their wickedness – how an individual can stand against wickedness, rebel against an order, not obey it, and not absolve himself of the guilt of murder by saying: I received an order from my king. And righteousness or wickedness is not a result of national or racial affiliation, and just as Ruth and Naomi came out of Moab and Ammon, so these two righteous women came out of Egypt.” - “New Studies in Shemot (Exodus)”, published by the World Zionist Organization.
(The text Highlights are mine)
It seems to me that this controversy is not an unnecessary quibble. I see in the stories of the women in the book of Exodus in general, and in the story of the midwives in particular, a clear message against the dehumanization of the other, the one who is not part of our people.
The brave midwives who saved the male babies, like Pharaoh's daughter who saved Moses, and like Zipporah the Midianite who showed enormous resourcefulness in the mysterious story of the circumcision at the night encampment (Exodus, 4, 24-26), represent and choose moral conduct, which is fundamentally humane, fatefully full of meaning. It is especially meaningful coming from those who are not part of the people of Israel!!! It seems to me that this distant text resonates with an important and very relevant message for us as well, the descendants of the people who were redeemed and came out of Egypt.
Shabbat Shalom!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rabbi Dani Danieli is a secular humanist rabbi, organizational consultant, and mentor for managers. He was previously the founding director and deputy general manager of Beit Avi Chai, a Jewish-Israeli cultural center in Jerusalem. Throughout his career, Dani has been involved in cultural and Jewish identity initiatives, including dialogue programs like the "Reconciliation Decree," a curriculum tailored to secular pre-military and religious-secular preparatory courses. He is also an activist for human rights and a Rabbis for Human Rights board member.